RE:CZ

FMAB Signal Performs Excellently, Ready for Live Trading Deployment

Quantitative Finance

👤 Cryptocurrency traders, quantitative strategy developers, investment analysts
This article reports the excellent performance of the FMAB signal on ETH, with a baseline return of 100% and an increase to 4600%~120000% after anti-Martingale betting, far surpassing other strategies. The author announces plans for live trading, emphasizing the need to prepare capital for a long-term engineering effort. It also notes that the FMA signal performed poorly, causing drawdowns, and reflects on insufficiently scientific position management. Based on test results from February 11, 2026, the article aims to share signal strategy validation and live trading deployment plans.
  • ✨ FMAB signal achieved a baseline return of 100% on ETH, increased to 4600%~120000% after anti-Martingale betting
  • ✨ Preparing for live trading, requiring capital preparation for a long-term engineering effort
  • ✨ FMA signal performed poorly, causing drawdowns, reflecting on insufficiently scientific position management
📅 2026-02-11 · 213 words · ~1 min read
  • FMAB signal
  • ETH return
  • Anti-Martingale betting
  • Live trading deployment
  • Position management
  • Signal strategy
  • Drawdown analysis

It is now February 11, 2026, in the afternoon.

Congratulations are in order. The FMAB signal provided by Mage has performed exceptionally well, with the benchmark signal achieving a 100% return on ETH. After applying anti-Martingale betting, the performance surged to 4600% ~ 120000%, which are staggering numbers. In comparison, under the same market conditions, the benchmark signal strategy only yielded returns of 0% ~ 40% (including trend-following strategies, mean reversion strategies, breakout strategies, etc.). The random signal strategy performed averagely, which is reasonable.

To forge iron, one must be strong oneself

As I mentioned earlier, we are now preparing to go live with real trading. At this stage, we need to actively prepare the engineering aspects for a prolonged capital battle. Take that money, watch it burn!

On the flip side, there is also counterevidence. Some of our other signal strategies (FMA) have performed poorly and failed to deliver good returns. However, at the time, we considered them promising and included them in the Midas premium package. During the previous drawdown, it was the FMA signal on HYPE that caused a significant decline. Looking back now, we have a better testing platform to more effectively validate the quality of signal strategies.

Currently, there is substantial evidence suggesting that back then, the issue might indeed have been insufficiently scientific position management.

See Also